Jump to Navigation

New York Employment Law Blog

Many workers may finally be granted long-overdue employee rights

In the state of New York, most workers are legally protected by state and federal labor laws. In fact, most employees are so accustomed to having secure rights that they may not even be aware of all the liberties they enjoy. For example, few people would even consider working for pay below minimum wage and many workers take it for granted that the standard workweek is 40 hours or less. Though, thousands of people currently working in New York are not guaranteed many of the employee rights automatically granted to the majority. That is why state legislatures are working to improve conditions for farm laborers.

Around 100,000 farmworkers in New York are excluded from being protected under state labor laws because of an apparent exception in the state’s State Labor Relations Act. The idea that that many employees are subjected to substandard working conditions in an industry worth almost $5 billion might seem too outrageous to be true, but it is.

Could employee rights be compromised by bad credit?

Even as evidence begins to surface suggesting that the worst of the national recession may be in the past, those looking for work in New York and all across the country face stiff competition since experienced and novice workers now commonly find themselves applying for many of the same positions. Similarly, many industries are hesitant to completely replenish their workforce, contributing to a situation where the demand for work is higher than the supply. And now there is growing concern that another form of discrimination is infringing on employee rights and compounding the issue for many.

According to one study in the Journal of Applied Psychology, there is no correlation between issues like stealing in the workplace and employees’ credit ratings. Though, another study conducted by the Society for Human Resource Management found that almost half of employers conduct credit checks on prospective employees. In fact, the 2012 study suggests that many businesses check the credit of every single applicant no matter the position they are applying for. 

Employment discrimination on both sides

Issues like citizenship and immigration reform are complex in nature and are often embedded with emotion. Most people can personally identify with how immigration has effected them and their families for better or worse. And for thousands of workers in the state of New York and beyond, even workplace conditions can be influenced by immigration-related factors. In fact, allegations of race and national origin discrimination are on the rise in the country’s agriculture industry, illustrating that infringing upon some employee rights can effect everyone’s in the process.

It is estimated that domestic laborers provided the majority of the agricultural workforce in the U.S. around forty years ago. That is not the case now, however, since immigrants occupy most farm labor positions.

Disability discrimination at its most extreme

Even though laws are in place in New York and states across the country to protect workers’ rights against harassment and ill treatment, countless employees continue to fall victim to workplace discrimination each year. Fortunately, many victims do speak out against their offenders and seek the resources and representation they need to take legal action. Countless others, however, may suffer in silence. One federal lawsuit illustrates just how pervasive and horrific disability discrimination can be for some workers.

It only took jurors around eight hours to deliberate on a case involving 32 victims of disability discrimination. The lawsuit, which identified a turkey meat company as the defendant, was filed by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on behalf of employees at one of the defendant’s labor camps. 

Facing disability discrimination over weight

New York state and federal legislation can be tested by the troubles and trends of the times. As the values, needs and expectations of the American public evolve, the relevance and interpretation of certain policies may be reexamined to ensure they continue to serve their purpose effectively. In recent years it seems laws protecting against disability discrimination have come under scrutiny for how and if they relate to a growing demographic of Americans.  

Morbid obesity is a serious issue in the U.S. It is estimated that over 6 percent of the population is considered morbidly obese, and that number continues to go up. In order to be classified as being morbidly obese, an individual must have a body mass index of 40 or more. Characteristics of being morbidly obese include having limited mobility and serious health conditions like heart disease and diabetes. 

ENDA’s future is still unknown

Workers in the state of New York are protected under federal and state laws concerning workplace discrimination. The policies largely overlap, as both recognize traits like race, sex, religion and disability as guarded classes. Though, New York is one of only several states in the country to go above and beyond standards set by the federal government and offer equal employee rights to gay and transgender employees. Now, it seems the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate have the opportunity to vote on the matter, possibly updating anti-discrimination legislation to be more inclusive and relevant.

Many believe that there is no better time than now for the Employment Non-discrimination Act (ENDA) to pass. Sixty votes in the senate will be necessary for it to move on from that point, and it now has the support of a key Republican senator. Other prominent supporters of the bill are putting their weight behind it as well. 

Red-head workers are now protected from workplace discrimination

Anti-discrimination legislation is in place on the state and federal level to protect workers from harassment and other forms of mistreatment. The law establishes protected classes that are officially recognized as minorities and/or particularly vulnerable groups of people, and prohibits these protected classes from being singled out or treated differently because of their status. The federal government recently reconsidered its list of protected classes to include individuals with naturally red hair, prompting Some New York employers to take notice.

Instances of racial and national origin discrimination in the workplace may be more common than many New York workers realize. However, the federal government and agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) are well versed in recognizing discrimination in its many forms, and are therefore motivated to counter it before it can occur. 

NFL reinforces policies on sexual orientation discrimination

When it comes to anti-discrimination policies, state and federal legislation largely align. The federal government identifies several protected classes that are safeguarded under the law from harassment and other forms of mistreatment. All employees are protected from discrimination on the basis of their gender, religion, race, age, disability, national origin and criminal record. However, the state of New York is one of only a few to recognize sexual orientation as a protected class as well. As such, the state’s attorney general recently called upon one of the country’s largest sport leagues to address concerns of sexual orientation discrimination.

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman recently initiated a campaign with the National Football League (NFL) to ensure that its hiring and work policies complement state laws regarding employment discrimination.  While the NFL apparently already had anti-discrimination measures in place for all of its teams, the league is working with the attorney general to ensure those guidelines are communicated and upheld by all employees. 

Victim's lawyer fees covered by defendant

When an individual feels that they've been mistreated and/or discriminated against in an illegal fashion, they have the right (obligation even) to seek legal counsel and hold their offender responsible under the law. Unfortunately, though, doing the right thing can also put a great burden on victims as they must often endure the emotional, physical and financial stress of the legal process. Fortunately, one victim can perhaps rest a little more easily knowing legal expenses related to her sexual harassment claim will be covered by the defendant in her lawsuit, Ulster County, New York.

The victim in this particular case worked as a correction officer at Ulster County Jail, where she claims she was repeatedly exposed to inappropriate conduct and offensive material. For example, the victim contends that male coworkers repeatedly made offensive remarks to her and openly displayed explicit content in the workplace. She also notes facing unlawful retaliation by superior officers when she complained of the situation.

Could background checks infringe on civil rights?

The hiring process is a very important one for prospective employees and employers alike. For applicants, it's the first step in securing work and any related benefits. And for employers, the act of vetting prospective workers can provide invaluable feedback about their potential strengths and weaknesses. That's why applying for many positions in New York, and throughout the country, can involve a series of interviews and other procedures. Though, it seems that employers are increasingly relying on background checks to narrow down their scope of new hires, which some fear could interfere with employee rights in some cases.

According to the Civil Rights Act as it pertains to hiring practices in the U.S., an employer cannot discriminate against an applicant by using information provided in a background check to single them out unfairly. However, the growing popularity of companies conducting background checks on job applicants might suggest that instances of hiring abuses may also be on the rise.

Contact Us

(212) 596-7735

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Subscribe to This Blog's Feed Visit Our Employment Law Website